|
"ver 1.0"
by James Lavin
I have compiled a list of useful proof techniques for you, my fellow
first-years, to assist you in proving results on the challenging
problem sets we are confronting this year. If you have any comments
or suggestions, please
email me.
Enjoy!
METHODS OF CONFUSION:
PROOF BY OBFUSCATION
If you write with the intent of confusing the reader, you
may succeed. Since the grader cannot pinpoint where your
answer deviates from the correct answer, she cannot mark your answer
"wrong."
PROOF BY HANDWAVING
Very similar to obfuscation, but this approach at least
attempts to SOUND like a proof.
PROOF BY JARGON
If you write as if you know what you are talking about, you
may convince the reader that you are more knowledgeable than they
are. They will then be afraid to disagree or mark your answer "wrong."
PROOF BY ILLEGIBILITY
If the grader cannot read your answer, how can it be wrong?
PROOF BY SATURATION
If you write a many-page "proof", no one will bother to check.
PROOF BY CONDENSATION
The opposite of saturation. You write an extremely terse
proof in which you skip many steps (thereby avoiding the necessity
of proving them!).
METHODS OF WISHFUL THINKING
PROOF BY INTUITION
If it feels good, go with it.
PROOF BY REPUTATION
Any idea you have ever had has already been thought of by
Ken Arrow. Since Arrow is always right, your idea must be true too.
[I must acknowledge Ron B. as the source of this brilliant piece of
logic!
PROOF BY PRAYER
If you pray that something is true, God might answer your
prayer.
PROOF BY INEBRIATION (OR HALLUCINATION)
Everything always looks better when you're drunk.
PROOF BY SELF-DEPRECATION
Think to yourself: "I've proven this to be false, but I am
ALWAYS wrong, so it MUST be true!"
PROOF BY ANALOGY
"A quasi-concave function is LIKE a concave function, so..."
PROOF BY EXASPERATION
If you stare at a partial, incorrect proof long enough, it
slowly looks more and more like a complete, correct proof.
PROOF BY ASSUMPTION
If your assumptions are invalid, then your results are invalid
too, so you might as well assume what you want to prove. This saves
time and frustration.
PROOF BY CONSENSUS
If everyone in the study group agrees, then it's got to be
true!
PROOF BY INTIMIDATION
Threaten the listener/reader/grader with serious consequences
if she disagrees (or speak in a threatening manner). [E.g., Raphael
vs. Murat... "This is BOGUS!"]
PROOF BY TRIVIALIZATION
How many times have you read in a textbook, "It is obvious
that..." or "It can easily be shown that..." or, "The attentive reader
will understand that..." It is no coincidence that these statements
are always made about the most difficult concepts in the book. The
author) could not prove them, so they trivialized them. It's a very
effective technique with widespread application and makes you look
very, very smart in the process!
PROOF BY SUPPOSITION
Suppose that the statement you are trying to prove is true.
Try to show a contradiction. If you cannot, then the statement must
be true!
METHODS OF CHEATING
PROOF BY UPPER-YEAR STUDENTS
Consult your favorite upper-year student who has been through
the course already.
PROOF BY LAST YEAR'S ANSWER SET
Superior to consulting upper-year students, but useful only
if they have bothered to save their notes. The more confusing the
class, the more likely they are to have burned their notes.
PROOF BY PROOF
Just find the result in a book somewhere and copy it.
METHODS OF TRANSFORMATION
If you get a result that you don't like, there are a few special
techniques which you might use to transform your intermediate result
into more desirable final result. These methods are applicable only
in special cases, but when they work, they can be a powerful method of
proof:
PROOF BY INTERPOLATION:
If you do two proofs and get two different answers and the
answer that you want lies in between, just take the appropriate
convex combination.
PROOF BY PARENTHESES:
Let's say that you have reduced the proof to solving the
equation
3 + 14 + 1 = 20.
It may seem that you are stuck, but if you are observant, you will
notice that adding parentheses will solve the problem:
(3 + 1)(4+1) = 20
PROOF BY TRANSFORMATION:
This encompasses a few cases. If you get X=2 and you
need X=10, just switch to base 2. Or, if you get X=0 and you
need X=1, just exponentiate. [These may seem to have limited
application, but since many proofs yield X=0 or X=1, the ability
to switch between them by taking logs or antilogs is a very useful
technique!]
PROOF BY SIGN CHANGE
Just multiply one side of the equation by -1.
PROOF BY ELIMINATION
Just cross out any troublesome terms.
METHODS OF DELAY
PROOF BY MATURATION
Just tell the grader that you will prove this later when you
are older and wiser.
PROOF BY FERMAT
"I had an elegant little proof of this, but this paper is not
large enough to write it down..."
PROOF BY TIME CONSTRAINT
When you absolutely must turn in the problem set, your pseudo
answer suddenly becomes a full proof. You just scribble it down and
you're done. [Corollary: wait till the last minute! You save lots
of time this way.]
|